Full-Text Screening and Exclusion Reasons
Move included and maybe records to full-text screening, upload PDFs, find open-access full texts, record exclusion reasons, and feed your PRISMA 2020 counts.
From abstracts to full texts
Full-text screening is the second selection stage: every record you marked Include or Maybe at the title and abstract stage is re-assessed against the eligibility criteria using the complete paper. In the tool, click Full-text screening in the sidebar (a Pro feature on a cloud-saved review). The panel lists exactly the records you kept; if it is empty, screen titles and abstracts first.
Get the full text
For each record you can upload the PDF (click Upload PDF) and read it in the built-in viewer without leaving the tool. Before hunting through your library, check the open-access finder: when a free, legal copy exists, the panel shows an Open free PDF link sourced from Unpaywall. If no free full text is found, the tool says so and suggests your library or a manual upload. Lookups are cached on the review, so a checked record is never queried twice.
Two batch helpers save the clicking on large reviews. Check all free PDFs runs the Unpaywall lookup for every record with a digital object identifier that has no PDF yet and reports how many free copies it found. Bulk upload PDFs takes a whole folder of PDFs at once and matches each file to its record by digital object identifier or title in the filename, then shows a report of what was attached, what failed, and which files matched no record.
Dual (blinded two-reviewer) full-text screening
The owner or an arbiter can switch on dual screening in the stage settings. Each reviewer then votes include or exclude (with a reason) without seeing the other reviewer's vote. Matching votes decide the record automatically. Disagreements, including two excludes with different reasons, appear in the Conflicts view, where the owner or an arbiter records the final consensus decision; PRISMA counts always follow the consensus decision, never an individual vote.
The stage settings also let you replace the built-in exclusion-reason list with your review's own reasons, so the reasons in your PRISMA flow diagram match your protocol word for word.
Decide and record the reason
- Select a record in the full-text list.
- Read the PDF in the viewer, or open the free full text.
- Click Include if the study meets all criteria.
- Click Exclude if it fails any criterion, then pick the exclusion reason. The built-in reasons are: Wrong study design, Wrong population, Wrong intervention, Wrong comparator, Wrong outcomes, Wrong setting, Wrong publication type (conference abstract, protocol, etc.), Full text not available, Not in eligible language, Duplicate / companion report, and Retracted. You can also type a custom reason.
- Move to the next record. Decisions save as you go and are logged in the audit trail.
PRISMA counts flow automatically
PRISMA 2020 requires you to report how many reports were sought, assessed at full text, and excluded with reasons. The tool tracks all of it: full-text decisions and their reasons feed the flow diagram builder, where reports assessed, exclusions grouped by reason, and final included counts appear in the right boxes. Open Build PRISMA diagram in the sidebar to see the figure update, adjust any number, and export it as an image for your manuscript.
Tips
- A record excluded at full text needs exactly one primary reason, the first criterion it fails, not a list of everything wrong with it.
Import your search export and try this workflow on your own review.
Start screening your recordsRelated guides
PRISMA 2020 Diagram and Reporting
Build a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram, link multiple reports into studies, generate methods text, cite the tool, and share read-only links with supervisors.
Data Extraction Forms and AI Extraction
Build data extraction forms from templates, run dual extraction with a consensus step, use AI extraction with evidence quotes, and export everything to CSV.
Risk of Bias Assessment and Figures
Appraise included studies with RoB 2, ROBINS-I, QUADAS-2, Newcastle-Ottawa, JBI checklists, AMSTAR 2, or a custom framework, plus publication-ready figures.