Paste log2 fold change and p-values to plot significance against effect size, threshold on the false discovery rate, label the top genes, and download a publication-ready SVG.
10 genes · columns: label, log2 FC, p-value
The volcano plot exists because neither effect size nor statistical significance means much on its own. A gene with a huge fold change but a weak p-value is often a low-count artefact, and a gene with a tiny fold change but an extreme p-value may be real yet biologically trivial. Plotting log2 fold change on the horizontal axis against the negative log10 of the p-value on the vertical axis puts both judgments in a single picture.
The negative log transform of the p-value is the trick that gives the plot its shape: it stretches the vanishingly small significant values, which would otherwise pile up against zero, into a tall spray while the non-significant majority stays low. The result is a dense unchanged cloud at the base and two significant arms rising to the left and right, the down- and up-regulated genes.
Correct thresholding is what separates a defensible figure from a misleading one. Because a differential expression experiment tests thousands of genes at once, the vertical threshold should be placed on the false discovery rate, not the raw p-value; this tool applies the Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for you. Pair it with the false discovery rate calculator to see the adjusted values directly and the log2 fold change calculator to build the horizontal axis from raw counts.
A volcano plot is the headline figure of a differential expression study, but it is the end of a pipeline that starts with normalization and a proper count model. The RNA-seq normalization calculator handles the first step, and for the complete analysis from raw counts to an annotated, corrected gene list and figure, the bioinformatics analysis service delivers reproducible results.
One row per gene with a label, the log2 fold change, and the p-value.
Choose fold-change and significance cutoffs, and threshold on the FDR-adjusted value for genome-wide data.
Up-regulated genes are red on the right, down-regulated blue on the left, top genes labelled.
Download a publication-ready SVG or export the classified table as a CSV.
Next step
Fold-change and false-discovery thresholds, gene-level statistics, and publication-ready figures, handled by a PhD statistician.
Our promise: Free pipeline re-run and figure revisions if reviewers push back.
Timeline
Most projects deliver in under 2 weeks. We confirm an exact date in your quote.
If reviewers push back
If reviewers question the pipeline, parameters, or figures, we re-run the analysis and revise free.
Confidentiality
NDA available on request before any project discussion. Your data, study design, and manuscript stay private either way.
Want a PhD methodologist to handle the whole project?
Get a complete differential-expression analysis with fold-change and false-discovery thresholds by a PhD statistician. Free pipeline re-run and figure revisions if reviewers push back. Pay only after you approve your quote.
A volcano plot is a scatter plot used in differential expression analysis that shows statistical significance against effect size for every gene at once. The horizontal axis is the log2 fold change and the vertical axis is the negative log10 of the p-value, so the most interesting genes, those that are both strongly changed and highly significant, sit in the upper left and upper right corners. It combines the two things you must consider together: how big a change is and how confident you are that it is real.
Points far to the right are strongly up-regulated and points far to the left are strongly down-regulated, while points high on the vertical axis are the most statistically significant. Genes that clear both a fold-change threshold and a significance threshold are the differentially expressed hits, usually colored to stand out. Points near the bottom center are unchanged and non-significant. Dashed lines mark the thresholds so you can see which genes pass.
The x-axis is the log2 fold change, the effect size, where positive values are up-regulated and negative values are down-regulated. The y-axis is the negative log10 of the p-value, so larger values mean smaller, more significant p-values. Plotting the negative log of the p-value spreads out the tiny significant values that would otherwise be crushed against zero, which is what gives the plot its characteristic shape.
The name comes from its shape. Most genes are unchanged and non-significant, forming a dense cloud at the bottom center, while the significant genes spray upward and outward to the left and right, resembling the plume of an erupting volcano. The two symmetric arms correspond to down-regulated and up-regulated genes.
Use the adjusted p-value, which controls the false discovery rate, because a differential expression experiment tests thousands of genes and raw p-values include many false positives. This generator can threshold on the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted value rather than the raw p-value, which is the correct choice for genome-wide analysis. Combining an FDR threshold with a fold-change threshold is standard practice.
A common default is an absolute log2 fold change of at least 1, meaning a twofold change, together with a false discovery rate below 0.05. These are conventions, not rules: a study of subtle regulation may lower the fold-change cutoff, while a very large study may tighten the FDR. The right thresholds depend on the biology and the tolerance for false positives, and they should be decided before looking at the results.
To compute the effect-size axis from counts, use the log2 fold change calculator, and to see the adjusted significance values the false discovery rate calculator applies the correction. To visualize the significant genes as a clustered matrix, the heatmap generator reorders by similarity. For the full differential-expression analysis, the bioinformatics analysis service delivers publication-ready results.
Reviewed by
Dr. Sarah Mitchell holds a PhD in Biostatistics from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and has over 15 years of experience in systematic review methodology and meta-analysis. She has authored or co-authored 40+ peer-reviewed publications in journals including the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medical Research Methodology, and Research Synthesis Methods. A former Cochrane Review Group statistician and current editorial board member of Systematic Reviews, Dr. Mitchell has supervised 200+ evidence synthesis projects across clinical medicine, public health, and social sciences. She reviews all Research Gold tools to ensure statistical accuracy and compliance with Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA 2020 standards.
Our PhD statisticians run the complete pipeline: differential expression with multiple-testing correction, survival modelling, dimensionality reduction, and publication-ready figures with a reproducible methods section. Constant pricing, most projects delivered in under two weeks.
Our promise: Free pipeline re-run and figure revisions if reviewers push back.
Your project is led by a named PhD methodologist with real credentials and published work.
4.9 / 5 across 1,194+ delivered projects