Published PhD Methodologists for Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, Statistics, and Thesis Chapters
We handle the methodological work: protocol development, literature search, dual-reviewer screening, data extraction, risk of bias (RoB 2, ROBINS-I V2, Newcastle-Ottawa, or QUADAS-2), GRADE certainty ratings, statistics, and a publish-ready draft formatted to your target journal or committee, following PRISMA 2020 and the current Cochrane Handbook (version 6.5). Need only the statistics or data analysis? We take that on its own too. You retain authorship and intellectual ownership. All contributions are disclosed per ICMJE guidelines. Quote within a few hours, fixed price, no surprises.
Eight Ways We Help Researchers Publish
From a single statistics question to a full PhD chapter, here is what we do.
Systematic Reviews
We search the literature, screen every paper twice, extract the data, and write the full review. Ready to submit to your target journal.
Learn moreMeta-Analyses
Pairwise, network, umbrella, and individual participant data. Forest plots, heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, reproducible R or Stata code.
Learn moreScoping Reviews
Map the evidence on your topic, identify gaps, and produce a clean PRISMA-ScR write-up for a grant proposal or a published review.
Learn moreThesis & Dissertation Chapters
Methodological support for the literature review, methods, results, and discussion chapters. Drafted to your committee's expectations and your university's formatting rules. Authorship stays with you.
Learn moreManuscript Writing
Turn your data into a publish-ready paper. We write the full manuscript and format it for the specific journal you are aiming for.
Learn moreBiostatistics
Sample size, study design, data analysis, figures. We run the numbers in R, Stata, or SPSS and give you the code so it is reproducible.
Learn moreResponse to Reviewers
Got a revise-and-resubmit? We draft a point-by-point response to every reviewer comment and rework the manuscript to match.
Learn moreGrant Methodology
Methods section, statistical plan, evidence review for your grant proposal. Written to satisfy R-series, MRC, or institutional reviewers.
Learn moreAlso available on request: protocol writing and PROSPERO registration, systematic search strategy design, health technology assessment and market access, pharmacovigilance literature screening, clinical data management, and more. Browse all services
Four Steps From Topic to Manuscript
Send us your topic
A one-paragraph description and any files you have. Takes a minute.
Quote within a few hours
A senior writer reviews and replies with a fixed price and timeline. No back-and-forth.
We build the review
A PhD writer searches, screens, extracts, and writes. A second writer cross-checks. A statistician runs the analysis.
You get a manuscript
Formatted for your target journal, with figures, tables, and the underlying data files. Revisions within your agreed scope.
The Standards Behind Every Manuscript
A review is judged on how it was built, not on who describes it. These are the published frameworks your project is built to, and the ones a peer reviewer will hold it against.
Reporting
Every checklist item answered inside the manuscript, not promised in the cover letter.
Conduct
Protocol first, screening second. Any deviation is recorded and explained, never quietly absorbed.
Risk of Bias
Domain-level judgements, each carrying the sentence from the source paper that justifies it.
Certainty
Ratings that answer the question every editor asks: downgraded for what, and by how much.
Everything a Reviewer Can Ask For, Before They Ask
A finished paper is the visible part. The rest is the audit trail: the searches, the decisions, the judgements, and the code that reproduces the analysis. It all belongs to you, and it is what turns a revise-and-resubmit into a short reply instead of a rebuild.
- The manuscript, formatted for the journal or committee you named
- A PRISMA flow diagram whose numbers reconcile at every stage
- The search string for each database, with the date it was run and the records returned
- Screening decisions, with a stated reason for every full-text exclusion
- Data extraction tables in a workbook you can open, sort, and edit
- Risk of bias assessments at domain level, with the supporting evidence
- Forest plots, funnel plots, and the heterogeneity statistics behind them
- Certainty ratings and a Summary of Findings table
- The R or Stata code that regenerates every number in the paper
- Your reference library, ready to import
How We Work With You
Four things that do not change, whether the project is a single statistical analysis or a multi-site review programme.
Your name on the paper
Authorship and intellectual ownership stay with you from the first search to the final proof. Contributions are disclosed the way ICMJE guidance expects.
We find the literature
You will never be asked for a library login, a database subscription, or a folder of papers to get started. Sourcing the evidence is our job, not yours.
Confidential by default
Every project is confidential from the first message. Your details, research questions, and deliverables stay protected, and everyone who works on your project is bound to keep it confidential. We never share, reuse, or publish your work without your written permission.
One price, agreed first
A fixed quote for a defined scope, sent before anything begins. The number you approve is the number you pay.
Revised until it holds
Committee questions, supervisor notes, and reviewer comments come back to us. We rework the methodology and the manuscript until it stands up, covered by our satisfaction guarantee.
What Researchers Say
“The process went very smooth, the work was delivered on time and it was very perfectly done, and the changes were also made on time and as guided. Thank you so much for your work done on time and with good efforts.”
Vidhi
Systematic Review - New Zealand
“Three months left in fellowship and a meta-analysis I had barely started. The team picked up the pooled analysis on heart failure outcomes, redrew every forest plot, and reran a leave-one-out sensitivity check I had not thought of. Submission went through with two rounds of revisions, both manageable. The reproducibility pack saved me real time when reviewers pushed back on the heterogeneity choices.”
Dr. S. Ahmed
Cardiology Fellow - Pakistan
“Scoping review on malaria chemoprevention attached to a foundation grant. Their librarian rebuilt the search across five databases, handled PROSPERO drafting, and dual-screened roughly 2,300 records. Turnaround on the protocol stage was slower than I expected, but they were upfront about it and the actual review landed on time. Would use them again for the next phase.”
Dr. R. Okonkwo
Public Health Researcher - Nigeria
“I came in with extracted data from 27 breast cancer trials and no statistician. They reconstructed the analysis in R, ran the network meta-analysis with SUCRA rankings, and built the GRADE Summary of Findings table I could not have written myself. The R scripts ran on my laptop without modification, which is rare.”
Dr. M. Al-Rashidi
Oncology Consultant - Saudi Arabia
“Umbrella review on cardiovascular outcomes after bariatric surgery. Deliverable arrived with full reproducibility files, AMSTAR-2 ratings on every included review, and a clean overlap matrix. My junior faculty could actually defend the methods section in seminar. Worth what we paid.”
Prof. L. Henrik
Department of Epidemiology - Denmark
“Network meta-analysis on neonatal sepsis treatment, fourteen antibiotics, eight outcomes. I would not have known where to start. Scope shifted twice on my side and they re-quoted both times without drama. Final network ranked the interventions cleanly and the sensitivity analyses held up under reviewer scrutiny.”
Dr. A. Patel
Paediatric Intensivist - India
Working With Universities, Hospitals, and Research Organizations
Institutions commission both single reviews and multi-review programs. Engagements run on formal itemized quotes, milestone-based payment schedules, and invoices your finance office can process, with a mutual non-disclosure agreement available before any project discussion. A named project director coordinates scope, milestones, and delivery across every manuscript, and each deliverable ships with the documented search logs and reproducible analysis code an audit requires.
Ready to Start?
Send us your topic. You will have a quote within a few hours.