Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis & Statisticsby Published PhD Methodologists

The process went very smooth, the work was delivered on time and it was very perfectly done, and the changes were also made on time and as guided. Thank you so much for your work done on time and with good efforts.

Three months left in fellowship and a meta-analysis I had barely started. The team picked up the pooled analysis on heart failure outcomes, redrew every forest plot, and reran a leave-one-out sensitivity check I had not thought of. Submission went through with two rounds of revisions, both manageable. The reproducibility pack saved me real time when reviewers pushed back on the heterogeneity choices.

Scoping review on malaria chemoprevention attached to a foundation grant. Their librarian rebuilt the search across five databases, handled PROSPERO drafting, and dual-screened roughly 2,300 records. Turnaround on the protocol stage was slower than I expected, but they were upfront about it and the actual review landed on time. Would use them again for the next phase.

I came in with extracted data from 27 breast cancer trials and no statistician. They reconstructed the analysis in R, ran the network meta-analysis with SUCRA rankings, and built the GRADE Summary of Findings table I could not have written myself. The R scripts ran on my laptop without modification, which is rare.

Umbrella review on cardiovascular outcomes after bariatric surgery. Deliverable arrived with full reproducibility files, AMSTAR-2 ratings on every included review, and a clean overlap matrix. My junior faculty could actually defend the methods section in seminar. Worth what we paid.

Network meta-analysis on neonatal sepsis treatment, fourteen antibiotics, eight outcomes. I would not have known where to start. Scope shifted twice on my side and they re-quoted both times without drama. Final network ranked the interventions cleanly and the sensitivity analyses held up under reviewer scrutiny.

Systematic review of CBT for treatment-resistant depression, tied to a federal grant resubmission. They delivered the protocol, full search log, dual screening, and a clean narrative synthesis in seven weeks. The resubmission was funded on the next cycle. Money well spent.

Antibiotic resistance surveillance review across six databases and four languages. Their information specialist ran translated search strings I could never have built alone, then documented every filter and limit for the PRISMA flow. The reproducibility pack alone saved me a week.

JBI-method systematic review on hospital-acquired pressure injuries. The team handled critical appraisal, extraction, and meta-synthesis. Email response in the first week was slower than I would have liked, but once I flagged it they assigned a named project manager and the rest of the project was on schedule. Thesis chapter passed without methodology revision requests.