Cost drivers and timeline
Pricing on our grant writing service is fixed before work begins. There are no hourly invoices, no surprise overruns, no upfront deposits. You pay only after each milestone is delivered. The fee is driven by three things:
- Grant size. A polished specific aims page is the smallest scope. A full R03, R21, K-award, or institutional pilot grant sits in the middle band (6 to 12 pages narrative plus attachments). A full R01 or NIHR Programme Grant is the largest, covering 12 pages narrative plus 30+ pages of attachments, budget justification, and reviewer-style mock critique.
- What you already have. If your specific aims and significance are strong, the Approach section drafting is a tighter, faster scope. If you have nothing on paper, the full pipeline runs end-to-end.
- Turnaround. A specific aims page is 7 days. A full R03 or K-award draft is roughly 4 weeks. A full R01 or NIHR Programme Grant is 6 to 8 weeks. Rush turnaround is available at a higher rate. We never start a grant without confirming your deadline is realistic on the free scoping call.
For a fixed quote, send us the funding opportunity announcement number, your specific aims (even rough), and your target submission date. We return a quote within 24 hours, no obligation.
Three things separate a funded grant from a triaged one. First, the specific aims must read as if the science is already half done. We write aims that anchor on quantitative pilot data, not vague "we will explore" hedging. Second, the statistical analysis plan must convince a reviewer who is not a statistician. We write a plan that is rigorous to a methodologist and readable to a clinician. Third, the innovation section must defend itself against a reviewer's reflex skepticism. We anticipate the three most likely reviewer objections and address each in advance.
Our team includes former NIH study section reviewers and successful R01-funded investigators. The same eyes that have scored other people's applications now score yours, before you submit.
If you have a complete draft and need a senior reviewer to tighten the prose, score the optics, and catch jargon, that is grant editing, a lighter scope of our academic editor for hire. If you have nothing on paper but a funded research line, that is grant writing, this service. If you need only the methodology section drafted (because your specific aims and significance are already strong), that is our grant methodology writing service, which is the right scope for many K-award and resubmission cases.
Borderline case: you have a draft of specific aims and significance but no Approach section. Most clients in that situation buy the Approach drafting plus a light edit on aims and significance. We can scope it that way and quote a single fixed fee within 24 hours.
Strong grants often require evidence synthesis to anchor the significance section. We can fold a small systematic review, a scoping review writing service, or a literature review writing service into the grant scope and write the synthesis section to PRISMA standard. For grants that propose a future meta-analysis or trial, our biostatistics service and grant statistical analysis plan handle the analytic-plan section. Bundle pricing applies when you scope several services at once; ask for a bundled quote.
- NIH R01, R03, R21, K01, K08, K23, K99/R00, F31, F32 (US biomedical and clinical research).
- NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research, HTA, EME, RfPB, Doctoral Fellowships (UK applied health research).
- AHRQ R01, R03 (US health services research).
- VA Merit Review (US Department of Veterans Affairs).
- AHA, BHF, CRUK, Wellcome (society and charity).
- Saudi MoH, KFAS, KSU, KAUST internal awards (Saudi Arabia).
- PSI Foundation, CIHR, NSERC (Canada).
- DFG, ERC, Horizon Europe (continental Europe).
- Institutional intramural pilot grants (US, UK, Gulf, India).
If your funder is not on this list, ask. We have written for over 40 distinct programs across 14 countries.
"Specific aims and approach for an NIHR Programme Grant on stroke rehabilitation. The mock review caught two reviewer objections we had not anticipated; we addressed them before submission and the grant was funded."
Verified Client, Principal Investigator, Rehabilitation Medicine
"Full R01 draft built from interviews with my team and our pilot data. Scored well enough on first submission to fund after one revise-and-resubmit cycle."
Verified Client, Associate Professor, Oncology